Hi Dhruv.
In any case, what you propose is the expected way of progressing a WG
document. Thank you for mentioning it: it is always better when authors
open the discussion themselves.
Another item to be discussed is on the type of document (standard track
/ experimental): feedback on this from the WG (especially implementers,
if any) would also be welcome.
Thanks
Julien
Le 04/04/2012 13:47, Dhruv Dhody a écrit :
Once the WG has made thedecisionon theadoption, wecanre-poll theWG and
get consensus onthe issue of encoding domain-sequence.Authors do have
a preference butweare completely open for what the WG consensus
dictatesand revise the document accordingly.
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
