Dear PCEers
In RFC5440 the IRO is defined as reusing the RSVP ERO subobject definition, the
PCEP ERO does the same but additionally ties both
Spaces ("PCEP ERO sub-object types correspond to RSVP-TE ERO sub-object
types.")
I suppose that the same applies to the PCEP IRO object, so that IRO subobjects
definition must be done first in CCAMP, yet a clarification from the WG would
be appreciated.
As the content of the object is relevant for the PCE, new ERO subobject would
need an additional definition in PCEP tin order to specify its processing, so
the following text would be true:
" Any RSVP-TE ERO sub-object already defined or
that could be defined in the future for use in the RSVP-TE ERO should be
additionally defined in PCEP IRO
PCEP IRO sub-object types correspond to RSVP-TE ERO sub-object types."
Best Regards
Cyril Margaria
Nokia Siemens Networks GmbH & Co. KG
NWS DWDM RD
St.Martin-Str. 76
D-81541 München
Germany
mailto:[email protected]
Phone: +49-89-5159-16934
Fax: +49-89-5159-44-16934
----------------------------------------------------------------
Nokia Siemens Networks GmbH & Co. KG
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München / Registered office: Munich
Registergericht: München / Commercial registry: Munich, HRA 88537
WEEE-Reg.-Nr.: DE 52984304
Persönlich haftende Gesellschafterin / General Partner: Nokia Siemens Networks
Management GmbH
Geschäftsleitung / Board of Directors: Dr. Hermann Rodler, Lydia Sommer, Olaf
Horsthemke
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats / Chairman of supervisory board: Herbert Merz
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München / Registered office: Munich
Registergericht: München / Commercial registry: Munich, HRB 163416
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
