Hi WG.

I have not seen any comment on the proposal below, nor on the existing IPR. As a result, authors, could you please submit draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-00 as an experimental I-D?

Thanks,

Julien


Le 04/05/2012 17:12, Julien Meuric a écrit :
Hi all.

Even though some issues need to be to addressed in the next steps, it looks like there is good support to adopt
draft-dhody-pce-pcep-domain-sequence as a PCE WG document.

One item is still on hold. Most authors agreed to move forwards with an experimental document. Has the WG any concern with this?

Thanks,

JP & Julien


Le 29/03/2012 18:29, JP Vasseur a écrit :
Dear all,

We had a pretty strong support for adopting draft-dhody-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-02 a PCE Working Group during our PCE WG meeting but
as usual we'd like to confirm on the mailing list.

Could you please let us know if you are in favor/opposed to adopting draft-dhody-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-02 as a PCE WG Document ?

Thanks.

JP and Julien.

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to