Hi Dan.

Thanks for addressing my comments.

I believe there is just one question pending, about section 4.7: "Is there a particular reason why the cancellation option is missing from the timeout case, while mentioned in the child error case?"

Cheers,

Julien


Le 28/06/2012 00:01, Daniel King a écrit :
Dear Julien, All.

As promised, please find a new revision addressing the LC comments.

Once again, thank you Julien for such a detailed review.

Thanks,
Dan.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
[email protected]

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
  This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element Working Group of
the IETF.

        Title           : The Application of the Path Computation Element
Architecture to the Determination of a Sequence of Domains in MPLS and GMPLS
        Author(s)       : Daniel King
                           Adrian Farrel
        Filename        : draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-fwk-03.txt
        Pages           : 31
        Date            : 2012-06-27

Abstract:
    Computing optimum routes for Label Switched Paths (LSPs) across
    multiple domains in MPLS Traffic Engineering (MPLS-TE) and GMPLS
    networks presents a problem because no single point of path
    computation is aware of all of the links and resources in each
    domain. A solution may be achieved using the Path Computation
    Element (PCE) architecture.

    Where the sequence of domains is known a priori, various techniques
    can be employed to derive an optimum path. If the domains are
    simply-connected, or if the preferred points of interconnection are
    also known, the Per-Domain Path Computation technique can be used.
    Where there are multiple connections between domains and there is
    no preference for the choice of points of interconnection, the
    Backward Recursive Path Computation Procedure (BRPC) can be used to
    derive an optimal path.

    This document examines techniques to establish the optimum path when
    the sequence of domains is not known in advance. The document
    shows how the PCE architecture can be extended to allow the optimum
    sequence of domains to be selected, and the optimum end-to-end path
    to be derived through the use of a hierarchical relationship between
    domains.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-fwk

There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-fwk-03

A diff from previous version is available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-fwk-03


Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to