Dear PCErs This revision includes editorial clarifications based on the feedback we received. We think that the encoding and procedures are stable and we would like the WG to review the document before we ask for Last call.
Your time and comments will be highly appreciated. Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen Cyril Margaria > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > ext [email protected] > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 9:29 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-07.txt > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element Working > Group of the IETF. > > Title : PCEP extensions for GMPLS > Author(s) : Cyril Margaria > Oscar Gonzalez de Dios > Fatai Zhang > Filename : draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-07.txt > Pages : 42 > Date : 2012-10-22 > > Abstract: > This memo provides extensions for the Path Computation Element > communication Protocol (PCEP) for the support of GMPLS control > plane. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-07 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions- > 07 > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
