Julien and JP,
There is a new IPR disclosure (https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2004/) just published for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures-03. Please pay note that the IPR license terms in the disclosure as we think they are more favorable than FRAND. We are very sorry that this disclosure came late. There are a few IPRs we were working on in the area of PCE-P2MP drafts and we accidently mixed them up, we thought we have made the IPR claim for the PCE-P2MP procedure draft, then we found out that the disclosures we made so far are only for RFC6006(IPR ID#1336 https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1339/ and ID#1669 https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1339/), but in fact the PCE-P2MP procedure draft should have a separate IPR claim for itself. I hope that the working group will be OK to continue with this work despite the IPR disclosure, but it is up to you as chairs to judge the consensus on this. Again, sorry for the confusion. Thanks, Quintin.
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
