Hi, Just to close on an issue here...
Yes, the IPR disclosure was removed at the request of the discloser. You can see this by clicking through the links from http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req/ to http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=document_search&id_document_tag=d raft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req and then to http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1869/ Cheers, Adrian > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Fatai > Zhang > Sent: 10 May 2013 09:03 > To: Julien Meuric; [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Pce] Last IPR Check on draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req-07 > > Hi Julien, > > I am not aware of any IPR to this draft. > > Note that I think the IPR that you mentioned below was removed (because the > disclosure was wrong). > > > > > > Best Regards > > Fatai > > -----Original Message----- > From: Julien Meuric [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 5:13 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Last IPR Check on draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req-07 > > Dear authors of the aforementioned I-D, > > Are you aware of any other IPR that applies to > draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req? If so, has all this IPR been disclosed in > compliance with IETF IPR rules? (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for > more details) > > Note that an IPR was disclosed on this I-D last summer. > > A response from each of you is expected. > > Regards, > > JP & Julien > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
