Hi,
Please find few comments for stateful PCE draft-05. 1. In the current draft, we don't have mechanism to carry Primary's PLSP-ID while delegating backup LSP. It would be required for a backup LSP to know its primary LSP paths. 2. There are chances where PcRpt/PcUpd message getting fragmented. Suggest, we can extend the PCEP fragmentation mechanism described in RFC 6006 to PcRpt and PcUpdate messages as well. We can have F bit in SRP object or else in LSP object(mandatory object) so as to support PCEP fragmentation. 3. Suggest to extend PcReport to carry all the objects in PcRequest(except RP) because, a. LSP object doesn't have mechanism to specify LSP's endpoint. b. There may be a case where PCC wishes to specify IRO/XRO while delegating LSP to a PCE. Regards, Venu
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
