El 11/10/2013 23:14, Ina Minei escribió:
ways to refer to an LSP: by its plspid bound to a given PCEP
connection, by its symbolic name, by its control plane identifiers, by
the srpid after a request.... The exact usage could be clarified and,
in latest versions, some seem to be redundant: can't the SRP id
replace the role of the symbolic name TLV?
[ina] The lsp name is the identifier, but since it's inconvenient to
send it around in messages the plsp-id takes that role. The
control-plane identifiers identify different instances of the lsp (to
disambiguate the two paths that briefly co-exist when doing mbb). The
srpid is not the lsp identifier, it is a transaction identifier.
Agreed and udnerstood, I guess then another question I have is whether
the transaction identifier should be transparent to the semantics of the
transaction, and the R flag moved to the LSP object?
Thanks,
R.
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
