The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5521,
"Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for 
Route Exclusions".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5521&eid=3750

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Dana Kutenicsova <[email protected]>

Section: 3.1.1

Original Text
-------------
The format and definition of PKS when it appears as an XRO subobject
are as defined in [RFC5520], except for the definition of the L bit.
The L bit of the PKS subobject in the XRO MUST be ignored.

Corrected Text
--------------


Notes
-----
The section does not describe the value of the X bit in PKS subobjects.

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC5521 (draft-ietf-pce-pcep-xro-06)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication 
Protocol (PCEP) for Route Exclusions
Publication Date    : April 2009
Author(s)           : E. Oki, T. Takeda, A. Farrel
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Path Computation Element
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to