Hi Victor,

Just one quick comment!

   You say in section 3

      Additionally, the BGP-LS speaker can be configured to send the
>       complete list of TE Links, including its details.  In this case,
>       the parent PCE has access to an extended database, with visibility
>       of both intra-domain and inter-domain information and can compute
>       the sequence of domains with better accuracy.  Even, the pPCE
>       could have enough information to compute the whole end-to-end path
>       by itself.


   But this would go against RFC6805, which says in section 4.4

      The topology and available resources within the child domain do
>       not need to be communicated to the parent PCE: doing so would
>       violate the PCE architecture.


   Transferring all information to parent PCE, would make it an "all
   seeing eye" which was never its intention.

Regards,
Dhruv



On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Victor Lopez <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> We have submitted a draft to describe how existing mechanisms (BGP-LS) can
> be used in H-PCE scenarios to feed the TED. Although PCE is very well
> defined, it is open to interpretation how to get the TED parameters.
>
> Any comments or suggestions are highly welcome!
>
> Victor, Oscar, Daniel and Stefano
>
>
> El 21/10/13 21:39, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> escribió:
>
> >
> >A new version of I-D, draft-lopez-pce-hpce-ted-00.txt
> >has been successfully submitted by Victor Lopez and posted to the
> >IETF repository.
> >
> >Filename:       draft-lopez-pce-hpce-ted
> >Revision:       00
> >Title:          Traffic Engineering Database dissemination for
> Hierarchical PCE
> >scenarios
> >Creation date:  2013-10-21
> >Group:          Individual Submission
> >Number of pages: 10
> >URL:
> >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lopez-pce-hpce-ted-00.txt
> >Status:          http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lopez-pce-hpce-ted
> >Htmlized:        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lopez-pce-hpce-ted-00
> >
> >
> >Abstract:
> >   The PCE architecture is well-defined and may be used to compute the
> >   optimal path for LSPS across domains in MPLS-TE and GMPLS networks.
> >   The Hierarchical Path Computation Element (H-PCE) [RFC6805] was
> >   developed to provide an optimal path when the sequence of domains is
> >   not known in advance.  The procedure and mechanism for populating the
> >   Traffic Engineering Database (TED) with domain topology and link
> >   information used in H-PCE-based path computations is open to
> >   interpretation.  This informational document describes how topology
> >   dissemination mechanisms may be used to provide TE information
> >   between Parent and Child PCEs (within the H-PCE context).  In
> >   particular, it describes how BGP-LS might be used to provide inter-
> >   domain connectivity.  This document is not intended to define new
> >   extensions, it demonstrates how existing procedures and mechanisms
> >   may be used.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> >submission
> >until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> >
> >The IETF Secretariat
> >
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar
> nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace
> situado más abajo.
> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and
> receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to