Support. On 11/12/13 6:14 AM, "Julien Meuric" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Hi all. > >Following the opposition expressed on merging MPLS and GMPLS documents >for stateful PCE, the sense of the room was in favor of adopting the >aforementionned I-D. >Now we would like to get the feedback of the mailing list: do you >support draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03 to become a foundation for >a PCE WG document? > >As usual, reasons for your preference are welcome (not to say mandatory >in case of opposition). > >Thanks, > >JP & Julien > >_______________________________________________ >Pce mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
