Hi Wu Qin, A couple of comments on the draft:
1. IMO, NAPTR may not be necessary. Instead, a dns-sd based solution should provide pretty much same functions. Please see the attached pic for an example of sequence diagram when dns-sd is used. Please note, while PCC only sends a PTR query for pce service, the DNS server may sends additional records in it response for efficiency. Please refer to section 12 of RFC 6763 for more details. 2. For TXT record, it seems you split it into multiple records, and put each key/value pair into a different record. This is not necessary. In addition, per RFC 6763, the key should not be more than 9 character long, and no space should be used in key, unless it's really necessary. Also, it's recommended to have a version tag in the TXT record. (see section 6 of RFC 6763 for more details). With these in mind, the TXT record in section 7.3 of your draft can be re-written as: ex2._pce._tcp.example.com: Type TXT, class IN, 0x09 txtvers=1, 0x0e scope=inter-as, 0x1a capability=link constraint, 0x0b domain=as10, 0x10 peerDomain=area1 Yi From: Qin Wu <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Thursday, November 7, 2013 1:01 AM To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Daniel King <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [dnssd] Solicit feedback to draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-03 Hi,DNSSDers: The draft-wu-dns-pce-discovery was presented twice in the PCE Working Group since Last Berlin meeting (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-03<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wu-pce-dns-discovery-003> ) and is dealing with DNS based PCE discovery. Currently the draft almost complete protocol design. For the followup, at the request of PCE WG chair, we like to ask some review from DNS experts in the DNSSD WG and solicit feedback to this draft. If you are interested and would like to offer help for review, I will appreciate very much. Please freely send your comments to either the list or directly to us. Regards! -Qin Wu
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
