El 29/01/2014 16:37, Adrian Farrel escribió:
Hi Working Group (and chairs),
When this I-D was adopted there was talk about how we might keep it alive to
collect other questions as they came along. Well, it has been a bit quiet and
no-one seems to have had anything to add.
Or should we draw a line under it, publishing it as a snap-shot of the current
scenery, and let another document be written if more questions develop?
Dear Adrian, all,
Just my humble opinion: if the WG moves forward with new "items" (such
as it has been the case, for example, of the stateful capabilities)
which could, in turn, raise futher questions, the "time window" during
which such questions will be identified will probably span months if not
years. In light of this, I believe the document covers well the main
questions regarding PCE as it is now (barred that someone else may
propose additional Q&A) and justifies publication in its (basically)
current format. -bis, -ter versions could be written in the future, if
need be.
Thanks
R.
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
