Working Group,
I support the adaoption of this document since it addresses a real problem and provide a very good starting point for solving this problem. The document is not entirely clear when it comes to defining "GMPLS LSP", I assume that a GMPLS LSP includes LSPs whith one of the switching types listed in the IANA registry: http://www.iana.org/assignments/gmpls-sig-parameters/gmpls-sig-parameters.xhtml#gmpls-sig-parameters-3 /Loa On 2014-03-04 11:51, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) wrote:
Dear WG, As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today where we had some support for adopting draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as a PCE WG. Would you be in favor/opposed (and why if you want to justify) of adopting draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as a WG document ? Thanks. JP and Julien. _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
-- Loa Andersson email: l...@mail01.huawei.com Senior MPLS Expert l...@pi.nu Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64 _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
