Dear WG, We had a clear consensus to adopt draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as PCE WG Document as a PCE WG document. Authors, please re-submit as draft-ietf-pce-pceps-00 with no change other than document name, title and dates.
Two comments: 1) As discussed during the WG meeting, please share with the mailing list the status of your discussion with the experts from the transport area 2) I would suggest (in revision 01) to not use the terms PCEPS, for the reasons discussed during the WG meeting, unless anyone objects of course. Thanks. JP and Julien. _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
