Hi, [snip]
> [DD] I agree with this and I see that you have added text in -03 version. > But my concern is with the fact that the current section only talks about "re- > optimization or re-routing". > As you also mention that, there might be 'delegation' before LSP establishment > and thus I was thinking something in line of.... > > OLD: > LSP delegation [I-D.ietf-pce-stateful-pce] is the process where a PCC > (usually an ingress LSR) passes responsibility for triggering > reoptimization or re-routing of an LSP to the PCE. In this case, the > PCE would need to be both Stateful and Active. > > NEW: > LSP delegation [I-D.ietf-pce-stateful-pce] is the process where a PCC > (usually an ingress LSR) grants the right to suggest updates to LSP attributes > of an LSP to the PCE. In this case, the > PCE would need to be both Stateful and Active. > > ... so that it doesn't limit to re-optimization/re-routing as well as only 'suggest' > updates! > I hope this change is reasonable? OK, I get your point. A _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
