Dear WG, There is a clear consensus: authors please resubmit as draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-00.txt, with no other change than title, date.
Thanks. JP. On Sep 14, 2014, at 3:54 PM, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: "JP Vasseur (jvasseur)" <[email protected]> >> Subject: [Pce] Adopting of draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt as PCE >> WG Document >> Date: September 14, 2014 at 12:06:28 PM GMT+2 >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> >> Dear WG, >> >> We had several discussions showing a good consensus adopting >> draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt and this work >> has considerably progressed in other WG. >> >> Are you in favor of adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt as a >> PCE WG document ? >> >> Thanks. >> >> JP and Julien. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pce mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
