Hi WG, We have uploaded the merged document.
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-06 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-06 Note that there are no major technical change, just reorganization to accommodate the draft-wu-pce-pcep-link-bw-utilization text. Request WG to have a relook and provide comments on this version. As the companion OSPF/ISIS WG documents have made progress and heading to IESG, we would be requesting PCE WG to move this document along as well. Thanks! Dhruv > -----Original Message----- > From: Pce [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody > Sent: 14 November 2014 10:26 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Pce] Regd pcep-service-aware & pcep-link-bw-utilization > drafts > > Hi, > > During the discussion with chairs regarding moving the following > drafts along - > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware/ > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wu-pce-pcep-link-bw- > utilization/ > > It was pointed out that for the sake of consistency with OSPF/ISIS- > metric extension documents (in post-WG-LC and ongoing-WG-LC), that > having a single merged document from PCEP would be a better choice. > > We can merge the second document content into the first one and get a > new version out soon after IETF week, once the dust is settled. > > If you have concerns with this approach, do let us know. > > Thanks! > Dhruv > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
