Hi All, We have updated the draft "draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth" based on the comments received during the Dallas meeting.
The main changes are - - Rakesh joined the team as co-author and provided valuable inputs and text - Added clarity in the draft with respect to the two deployment models with a table summarizing the requirements and differences - Added a scaling consideration section o Added a mechanism to report bandwidth samples together, reducing the number of PCRpt messages o Described the use threshold to further curb them - Encoding o Added sub-TLVs for the AUTO-BANDWIDTH-ATTRIBUTE TLV § Described each sub-TLV § Part of LSPA object (instead of LSP object) o New BANDWIDTH object type for Bandwidth-Usage reporting § Allow multiple samples - Editorial Changes The diff can be found at - https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-04&url2=draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-05 I-D: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-05 Please continue to provide feedback... Regards, Dhruv
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
