Function. -- but encoding is fine too (and why not?)...
Lou On 07/26/2015 09:19 AM, Ina Minei wrote: > Lou, > > Thank you for the feedback. Can you clarify the first comment about > reuse of the extended association object from RFC6780, are you asking > about the object encoding or about the function? > > Ina > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 2:02 AM, Lou Berger <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Authors, > Useful draft & additional function. I have two comments: > > 1) Is there a reason to not follow and provide the full function > supported by RSVP Extended ASSOCIATION Object [RFC6780]? > > 2) For Association Source field I suggest: > OLD > An IPv4 or IPv6 address, which > is associated to the PCE peer that originated the association. > NEW > An IPv4 or IPv6 address, which > identifies the originator of the association > > Thanks, > Lou > > _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
