Hi Tom, 

Looks like you are poking the dead 
http://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/wg/netmod/yang-1.1/issues.html#sec-41 marked 
"dead" :)

Interesting to see that ODL used base64 
(https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/BGP_LS_PCEP:Troubleshooting) here. 

Dhruv

> -----Original Message-----
> From: t.petch [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 29 September 2015 14:34
> To: Dhruv Dhody; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Pce] Encoding in draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware
> 
> Just the obvious comment that while consistency within PCE is good, yet
> YANG shows no signs of being able to model floating point values.
> 
> Tom Petch
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dhruv Dhody" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 1:21 PM
> Subject: [Pce] Encoding in draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware
> 
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> In the service-aware draft [1], the new metric type encoding were
> similar to the IGP ([2][3]) encoding with 24-bits integer format.
> 
> In this we deviated from RFC5440 [4] and other metric types where the
> metric value is always encoded in 32-bits in IEEE floating point format
> [5].
> 
> The authors discussed and wanted to align it to the rest of PCEP and
> use 32-bits floating point instead.
> 
> Please find the attached update and the diff file for your reference.
> 
> WG, please let us know if you disagree with this change.
> 
> [1]
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-
> 07#section
> -4.1.1.1
> [2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7471
> [3]
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-isis-te-metric-
> extensions
> -07.txt
> [4] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5440#section-7.8
> [5] http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?punumber=4610933
> 
> Regards,
> Dhruv (on behalf of co-authors)
> 
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> --------
> 
> 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pce mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
> >

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to