Thanks Dhruv. > On Oct 6, 2015, at 8:57 PM, Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Chairs, > > This version refreshes the expired draft (no changes made in the content). > The WG LC [1] was issued last year on -01. The -02 update [2] handled all the > comments made during the last call. > > [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/PcJ5gBy2uqWAmilDKMqVjQyl6Ss > [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/MYVoNouTERYgfRlGPxhcGycKoy0 > > Regards, > Dhruv (on behalf of co-authors/contributors) > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Pce [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of internet- >> [email protected] >> Sent: 07 October 2015 10:18 >> To: [email protected] >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-03.txt >> >> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >> directories. >> This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element Working Group of >> the IETF. >> >> Title : Optimizations of Label Switched Path State >> Synchronization Procedures for a Stateful PCE >> Authors : Edward Crabbe >> Ina Minei >> Jan Medved >> Robert Varga >> Xian Zhang >> Dhruv Dhody >> Filename : draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-03.txt >> Pages : 23 >> Date : 2015-10-06 >> >> Abstract: >> A stateful Path Computation Element (PCE) has access to not only the >> information disseminated by the network's Interior Gateway Protocol >> (IGP), but also the set of active paths and their reserved resources >> for its computation. The additional Label Switched Path (LSP) state >> information allows the PCE to compute constrained paths while >> considering individual LSPs and their interactions. This requires a >> reliable state synchronization mechanism between the PCE and the >> network, PCE and path computation clients (PCCs), and between >> cooperating PCEs. The basic mechanism for state synchronization is >> part of the stateful PCE specification. This draft presents >> motivations for optimizations to the base state synchronization >> procedure and specifies the required Path Computation Element >> Communication Protocol (PCEP) extensions. >> >> >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations/ >> >> There's also a htmlized version available at: >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-03 >> >> A diff from the previous version is available at: >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync- >> optimizations-03 >> >> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pce mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
