I’d suggest you to have a look at draft-sivabalan-pce-binding-label-sid-00.txt
Thanks. s. > On Nov 1, 2015, at 7:39 AM, Lizhenbin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Folks, > We proposes two drafts on the new type of segment in the segment routing: > draft-li-spring-tunnel-segment-00 and draft-li-pce-tunnel-segment-00. > -- draft-li-spring-tunnel-segment-00 proposes the possible usecases such as > reduce SID stack depth of SR path, span the non-SR domain or provide > differentiated services. This document also proposes the difference between > the adjacency segment and the tunnel segment. These work will help to > understand the necessity and advantages of tunnel segment in some application > scenarios. Then we define the forwarding mechanism and protocol extensions > requirements on tunnel segment. > -- draft-li-pce-tunnel-segment-00 proposes the possbile PCEP protocol > extensions for the tunnel segment based on draft-li-spring-tunnel-segment-00. > The protocol extensions are introduced for two different applications: 1. > PCEP extensiosn from PCC to PCE; 2. PCEP extensions from PCE to PCC. > > Hope you could have interest in these drafts, help review or refine. You > comments will be appreciated. > > > > Thanks & Regards, > Zhenbin (Robin) > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
