Hi Dhruv, Support, very much needed!
Thanks, Jeff On 6/9/16, 5:09 AM, "Pce on behalf of Dhruv Dhody" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: >Hi WG, > >In PCE IANA registry [http://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep] we do not have any >codepoints for experimental usage. As we work on some new experiments with >PCEP (sometimes in open source platform), it would be wise to use experimental >codepoints to avoid any conflict. For this purpose we have written a small >draft to carve out some codepoints for experimental usage for PCEP messages, >objects and TLVs. > >https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dhody-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints-00 > >Please provide your feedback. > >Thanks, >Dhruv & Daniel > >----- > >Name: draft-dhody-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints >Revision: 00 >Title: Experimental Codepoint Allocation for Path Computation Element >communication Protocol (PCEP) >Document date: 2016-06-09 >Group: Individual Submission >Pages: 5 >URL: >https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dhody-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints-00.txt >Status: >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints/ >Htmlized: >https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dhody-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints-00 > > >Abstract: > IANA assigns values to the Path Computation Element (PCE) > communication Protocol (PCEP) parameters (messages, objects, TLVs). > IANA established a new top-level registry to contain all PCEP > codepoints and sub-registries. The allocation policy for each new > registry is by IETF Consensus. > > This document seeks to mark some codepoints for experimental usage of > PCEP. > >_______________________________________________ >Pce mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
