Jari Arkko has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


The document should probably say more about how frequently information
can be updated and recomputation can occur; there's a possibility that
too frequent adjustment creates a flip flop effect where traffic moves to
a new path, performance degrades, etc.

I was curious about the definition of the P2MP packet loss as being the
highest among the individual path losses. Is there some basis in some
measurement documents for instance for this definition? It would seem to
me that other definitions would also be possible, e.g., ones that take
the aggregate loss into account in some fashion.

Pce mailing list

Reply via email to