On 10/03/2016 04:30 PM, Dhruv Dhody wrote: > (1) Allow Empty ERO to mean no path. > > Let it be valid in all messages to mean that no intended path exists for > this LSP. > > As per -16, > > - empty ERO is added in the end of synchronization marker (PCRpt). > > - The ERO may be empty if the PCE does not have a path for a delegated LSP. > > > > We can add text in section 6.2 to say something like – > > > > The ERO may be empty if the PCE does not have an intended path for the > delegated LSP. > > If the local policy allows it, the PCC SHOULD signal the tear down of > the LSP. At > > this time, PCC MAY also revoke delegation and use a locally computed > path instead. > > > > To me this is more logical and in spirit with the rest of the document, > also would require least amount of changes in existing implementations.
+1 Thanks, Robert
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
