That’s fine. Thanks!

> Am 31.10.2016 um 10:00 schrieb Zhangxian (Xian) <[email protected]>:
> 
> Hi, Mirja, 
> 
>    Thank you very much for your review and comments. 
> 
>    We have addressed Alvaro's comments by removing all the dependencies to 
> protocol extensions drafts (see latest draft at: 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app-08).  As for your 
> additional comment about Section 4, we think it more appropriate in this 
> draft, so we would like to keep it here.  However, we have made the following 
> two changes related to this section: 
> 1) moving it after the scenario section since the latter is more ; 
> 2) removing any reference to protocol-spec draft and make the description in 
> a protocol-neutral manner. 
> 
> Are you ok with these changes?
> 
> Cheers,
> Xian
> 
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Mirja Kuehlewind [mailto:[email protected]] 
> 发送时间: 2016年10月27日 1:06
> 收件人: The IESG
> 抄送: [email protected]; Jonathan Hardwick; 
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> 主题: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app-07: 
> (with COMMENT)
> 
> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app-07: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email 
> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this 
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I agree with Alvaro's comment. To me one important question here is if 
> section 4 (Deployment Considerations) should be moved back into the stateful 
> pce spec?!
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to