Hi, Igor,

      Thank you. But you are disagreeing with a old version of this draft. At 
that time, it was indeed no IETF model providing this functionality, :).

The latest version (01) version of this draft states:

         +-------------+-----------------------+---------------------------+
         |Path Comp.   | Path Computation pre  |                           |
         |             | service provisioning  |     ietf-te.yang          |
         +-------------+-----------------------+---------------------------+

   However,  The draft also notes ongoing online/offline discussions as below:
“
  For path computation, [I-D.busibel-teas-yang-path-computation]
   presents now only use cases but YANG model work is also under
   consideration to provide statelss path computation RPC.  There is
   currently ongoing discussions on how to provide such a function using
   the TE tunnel model defined in [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te] as a base.
“

Cheers,
Xian

发件人: Teas [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Igor Bryskin
发送时间: 2016年11月3日 21:15
收件人: Daniele Ceccarelli; CCAMP ([email protected]); [email protected]; TEAS WG 
([email protected]); [email protected]
主题: [Teas] draft-zhang-ccamp-transport-yang-gap-analysis-01

Hi,

In the 
4.4<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-ccamp-transport-yang-gap-analysis-00#section-4.4>.
  Function Summary and Related YANG Models, I read:

+-------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+
         |Path Comp.   | Path Computation pre  |                       |
         |             | service provisioning  |      NONE             |
         +-------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+

I disagree with this assessment. TE tunnel model defines the COMPUTE_ONLY mode 
explicitly designed to be used  to support Path computation NBI.

Cheers,
Igor


From: Pce [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Daniele Ceccarelli
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2016 5:13 AM
To: CCAMP ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>); 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; TEAS WG 
([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>); [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [Pce] CCAMP and JOINT YANG session agenda @IETF97

Hi all,

the first version of the agenda for the CCAMP session and the Joint YANG 
session is available at the following link.

https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/97/agenda/agenda-97-ccamp-01

Please let us have your comments

Thanks
MPLS, PCE, TEAS and CCAMP (chairs and secretaries)
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to