Ben, Please see the text proposed to address Mirja's Comment.
Thanks, Adrian > -----Original Message----- > From: Pce [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ben Campbell > Sent: 15 March 2017 01:06 > To: The IESG > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: [Pce] Ben Campbell's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-ext-12: (with > DISCUSS) > > Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-ext-12: Discuss > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-ext/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > DISCUSS: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > If I am reading things correctly, the security considerations just say > the extensions in this draft may raise new security considerations, but > doesn't say anything about what they might be. That's an incomplete > analysis. What new considerations actually (not "may") exist? What > potential attacks may be enabled by these extensions, if any? Are there > things people can do to mitigate them? > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
