Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-ext-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-ext/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The "enhanced" security considerations proposed in response to Mirja's comments resolve my discuss. I am clearing on the assumption it makes it into the draft. I've moved my discuss point into the comments for now: <old-discuss> If I am reading things correctly, the security considerations just say the extensions in this draft may raise new security considerations, but doesn't say anything about what they might be. That's an incomplete analysis. What new considerations actually (not "may") exist? What potential attacks may be enabled by these extensions, if any? Are there things people can do to mitigate them? </old-discuss> _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
