Yes, I think we should use this document to sort out the squatting and pointless consumption of code points by open source releases that don't go anywhere. I'm not 100% convinced that this will stop squatting, but it offers a way to not squat. I think I will want to whine about some of the details of this document, but that can be done once it is a WG draft. Thanks, Adrian From: Pce [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick Sent: 10 April 2017 11:39 To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-dhody-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints-03 All, This is the start of a two week poll on making draft-dhody-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints-03 a PCE working group document. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints/ Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state your reasons. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document. The poll ends on Monday, April 24. Many thanks, Jon
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
