Hi Kathleen, > -----Original Message----- > From: Pce [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kathleen Moriarty > Sent: 02 August 2017 21:56 > To: The IESG <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected] > Subject: [Pce] Kathleen Moriarty's Yes on draft-ietf-pce-pceps-15: (with > COMMENT) > > Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-pce-pceps-15: Yes > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pceps/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I support EKR's discuss points, especially the first. > > I'm a yes assuming that all the discuss points will be addressed, as I do > think this work is important and am glad to see it. In addition to other > comments, I don't think anyone else commented on the use of the word > "privacy" instead of confidentiality in the security considerations > section. That should be changed. Thank you. > > [[Dhruv Dhody]] Please see my reply to EKR's. I have also updated the nit you pointed out.
Regards, Dhruv > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
