Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- * Appendix A: Did you mean "responses" instead of "requests" in this sentence? "Update to the reply message to allow for bundling of multiple path computation requests..." * I agree with Benoit and Mirja that summarizing all the changes since RFC6006 would be useful (Thanks for doing this for the RBNF!) _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
