Hi Adrian, Thanks for your thoughts.
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 4:58 AM, Adrian Farrel <[email protected]> wrote: > The purpose of this document is to adjust the registries to allow > experimentation, not to redefine or refine the meaning of Experimental > codepoints. > > We do draw out the security concern that we think 3692 glossed over, but > this is > a reminder to protocol specs or implementers that they must watch out. > This is > not a protocol spec and doesn't need to describe how implementations handle > conflicts. > No, but it does need to describe the impact of what happens when there is confusion, which it presently does not. This is not solely a security concern but also an interoperability and correctness concern. -Ekr > > Ciao, > Adrian > >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
