> On Dec 27, 2017, at 5:46 AM, Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Brian, 
> 
> Thanks for your review. 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Pce [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian Carpenter
>> Sent: 23 December 2017 06:25
>> To: [email protected]
>> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
>> Subject: [Pce] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-
>> codepoints-04
>> 
>> Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
>> Review result: Ready
>> 
>> Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
>> Review Date: 2017-12-23
>> IETF LC End Date: 2017-12-28
>> IESG Telechat date: 2018-01-11
>> 
>> Summary: Ready
>> --------
>> 
>> Comment:
>> --------
>> 
>> fwiw, I agree with this:
>> 
>>   [RFC3692] asserts that the existence of experimental code points
>>   introduce no new security considerations.  However, implementations
>>   accepting experimental codepoints need to take care in how they parse
>>   and process the messages, objects, and TLVs in case they come,
>>   accidentally, from another experiment.
>> 
>> There are a few words in https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6709#section-5
>> that might also be relevant. An experimental code point is in effect a
>> protocol extension with unknown security properties.
>> 
> [[Dhruv Dhody]] We could add this text as per your suggestion -  
> 
>   Further, an implementation
>   accepting experimental code points needs to consider the security
>   aspects of the experimental extensions.  [RFC6709] provide various
>   design considerations for protocol extensions (including those
>   designated as experimental).

This seems reasonable to me.

Brian, thanks for your review. I entered a No Objection ballot.

Alissa

> 
> Thanks! 
> Dhruv
> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pce mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to