I am in full support of the changes and in full support of this draft. 
I would like to thank all of the supports that we are getting for this draft.

A. Raghuram
Global IP/MPLS Backbone Design & Development

This communication may contain information that is privileged, or confidential. 
If you are not the intended recipient, please note  FYI that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  Anyone 
who receives this message in error should notify the sender immediately by 
telephone or by return e-mail and delete it from his or her computer. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 10:05 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request

Hi all,

Back in Prague, draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request raised clear interest. 
Since then, the authors have done their homework, including the removal of 
suggested values. Let us now share the question with the whole WG: do you think 
draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request is a good foundation for a PCE WG item?
Please send your responses to the PCE list, including rationales in case of 


Jon & Julien

Pce mailing list

Pce mailing list

Reply via email to