Hi Roni Many thanks for the review. You are right, in this case we meant "IETF Review". I will update the document.
Cheers Jon -----Original Message----- From: Roni Even [mailto:ron.even....@gmail.com] Sent: 26 February 2018 14:55 To: gen-...@ietf.org Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org; i...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type....@ietf.org Subject: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-08 Reviewer: Roni Even Review result: Almost Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-?? Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date: 2018-02-26 IETF LC End Date: 2018-03-06 IESG Telechat date: 2018-04-05 Summary: The document is almost ready for publication as standard track RFC Major issues: Minor issues: 1. in section 7.2 "The allocation policy for this new registry should be by IETF Consensus" why not use one of RFC8126 well known policies? Nits/editorial comments: _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce