This poll has ended, with the result that the document will be adopted by the PCE working group.
Authors - please could you resubmit the document (without changes) as draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection-00. There were some comments received from Greg Mirsky during working group last call. Authors - please could you ensure that these comments are addressed promptly. If any changes are required, you can include them in version -01 of the document. Many thanks Jon From: Jonathan Hardwick [mailto:jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com] Sent: 27 March 2018 12:10 To: email@example.com; draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protect...@ietf.org Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org Subject: WG adoption poll for draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05 Dear PCE WG This is the start of a two week poll on making draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05 a PCE working group document. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection/ Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state your reasons. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document. The poll ends on Tuesday, April 10. Many thanks, Jon and Julien
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce