Hi, Jonathan,

On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Jonathan Hardwick <
jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com> wrote:

> Hi Spencer
> Thanks for your comments.  Please see [Jon] below.
> Cheers
> Jon
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Spencer Dawkins [mailto:spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 03 April 2018 03:23
> To: The IESG <i...@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-t...@ietf.org; Julien Meuric <
> julien.meu...@orange.com>; pce-cha...@ietf.org; julien.meu...@orange.com;
> pce@ietf.org
> Subject: Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-09:
> (with COMMENT)
> I'll let you folks work with Benjamin on this, but I echo his concern
> about the level of specification covering sub-TLVs (Spencer's summary: "not
> much specification").  As a related comment, I note that not defining any
> sub-TLVs in this document prevents the authors from giving any examples of
> what sub-TLVs might be appropriate, which would have been helpful for me in
> both the Abstract and Introduction.
> (I usually prefer clues about whether the reader should be reading a
> specification or not. It would be easier for me to know whether this
> document is relevant to me, if I knew what kinds of sub-TLVs were
> envisioned, even if only a couple of examples were provided. But do the
> right thing, of course)
> [Jon] I have proposed an update to Benjamin.  The draft does not need any
> sub-TLVs, hence there are no examples, which has been a frequent pattern in
> PCE RFCs since the working group got started!  Having said that, we could
> immediately point to the first real example of a PST sub-TLV by providing
> an informative reference to draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing.  I don't see
> a problem doing this as the documents were always intended to be published
> together.  How about
>   This document does not define any sub-TLVs.
>   This document does not define any sub-TLVs; an example can be found in
> [I-D.ietf-pce-segment-routing].

Since I was echoing Benjamin's concern, I'll echo his relief - whatever you
folks work out, will work for me.

But that sounds like a fine plan to me.

Pce mailing list

Reply via email to