Dear authors of draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-12,
My colleagues and I are interested in some clarifications:
1. In section 6.2.1 "If the first SR-ERO represents an MPLS label value
then the NAI field MUST NOT be absent..."
In case of binding SID as first SR-ERO, it can be MPLS label only, without NAI.
2. This draft defines the new error codes related to SR-ERO conversion,
that were not defined in previous version.
What is expected behavior of PCC in additional to sending error message.
For example:
In case PCUpd for PCE initiated LSP, PCE sends new SR-ERO objects to PCC. PCC
shall validate and interpret the SR-ERO EROs.
If SR-EROs cannot be converted to an MPLS label stack and a next hop, PCC shall
send PCErr message with Error-Type "Reception of an invalid object".
What is expected handling of new SR-EROs in updating LSP - LSP shall stay with
old SR-ERO objects or with new ones, but in down state?
Best regards,
Marina Fizgeer
Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
___________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains information
which is
CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If you have received
this
transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phone or fax, and then
delete the original
and all copies thereof.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
