Hi all, PCE chair hat on, I need to rectify the statement below: at this stage, PCE, as a WG, has not reach any consensus on this I-D, which has only been discussed within the LSR WG. There may be individuals involved in both WGs, but that is not a PCE WG consensus.
However, I suggest that the PCE WG's members (BCC'd) share their view on this poll using the LSR mailig list. Thanks, Julien On 13/11/2018 23:10, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > > At the LSR WG meeting in Bangkok, there was general agreement that we > should adopt this draft given that the PCE WG believes it is useful. > Please indicate your support or objection prior to 12:00 AM UT, > Wednesday November 26^th , 2018. Note the authors may refresh the > draft to address some comments prior to that time. > > > > > > Thanks, > > Acee > > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
