Support for WG adoption. I provided higher level comments to the -00 version, which were incorporated. There is still work to be done, that can be undertaken post WG adoption (some listed below).
Regards, Dhruv To Do - Introduction should be section 1 - Remove reference to BANDWIDTH object in section 3 - Reference to (or rather re-use of Unreserved Bandwidth well defined in https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3630#section-2.5.8) in section 2.1 - Reference to (or rather re-use of Residual Bandwidth well defined in https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7471#section-4.5.3) in section 2.2 - We can only define 'path' level and reuse 'link' level description from IGP - IDNITs - https://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-lazzeri-pce-residual-bw-01.txt - I am listed as co-author, may be move me to acknowledgement/contributor -- Dhruv Dhody Lead Architect Network Business Line Huawei Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. Survey No. 37, Next to EPIP Area, Kundalahalli, Whitefield Bengaluru, Karnataka - 560066 Tel: + 91-80-49160700 Ext 71583 II Email: [email protected] This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it! > -----Original Message----- > From: Pce [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric > Sent: 13 December 2018 18:35 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-lazzeri-pce-residual-bw > > Dear WG, > > We discussed about draft-lazzeri-pce-residual-bw a couple of times during > past IETF meetings. At that time, those in the room who had read it looked > quite interested, but they were just a few. We now request a feedback from > the list: do you support the adoption of draft-lazzeri-pce-residual-bw as > a starting point for a PCE work item? > (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lazzeri-pce-residual-bw-01) > > Please respond to the list, including your reasons if you do not support. > > Thanks > > Julien > > > P.S.: We are aware that the latest version of the I-D has expired, but an > adoption would solve that and a lack of interest may help the authors > focus their effort on something else than a simple timer reset. > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
