Hi, Dhruv, Julien, Adrian, Thank you all for the guidance on this work. I will work on these comments and provide an update within this month.
Best wishes, Haomian -----邮件原件----- 发件人: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:[email protected]] 发送时间: 2018年12月14日 13:51 收件人: Julien Meuric <[email protected]> 抄送: Farrel Adrian <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Zhenghaomian (Zhenghaomian, Optical &Microwave Technology Research Dept) <[email protected]> 主题: Re: [Pce] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-08.txt Hi All, I suggested to Haomian to describe the H-PCE(/ACTN) usecase as well where if child PCE does sticky resource [1] handling, the resources could be shared during path computation requests for various BN-In(i) to BN-Out(j) pairs (finaly Parent PCE would select only one of them). This would further highlight the applicability and usage of this feature. Thanks! Dhruv [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7399#section-13 On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 9:34 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi again, > > Thank you Adrian for sharing your support on this I-D. We agree that > no one expressed disagreement on that work. It therefore leaves this > I-D in a draw situation: it missed an opportunity to get adopted, but > there is no reason to exclude another poll to distinguish between bad > poll timing and lack of support. > I suggest the authors to keep on working on the document, including > the list as much as possible and we will eventually consider a 2nd > adoption poll. > > Cheers, > > Julien > > > On 27/11/2018 21:35, Adrian Farrel wrote: > > Hi Haomian, > > > > Thanks for continuing to move this work forward. > > > > As I said back in October, I think the topic is in scope for the working > > group. I have read this recent version of the draft and think it is ready > > for adoption. > > > > Although the previous adoption poll did not have a lot of support, no one > > spoke against, and there does appear to be a group of people willing to > > work on it - I see 6 names on the document and a further 3 who supported > > adoption. > > > > If the chairs think that the draft can progress in the WG, that would be > > fine. If not, could they give a hint of what the authors should do? > > > > Thanks, > > Adrian > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Pce <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Zhenghaomian > > (Zhenghaomian, Optical &Microwave Technology Research Dept) > > Sent: 19 November 2018 09:48 > > > > Dear WG, > > > > According to IETF 103 discussion, we update this work with a few changes in > > the text to better specify the motivation. We believe this work is > > technically ready for WG adoption, again. > > > > Please take a look and your comments are highly welcome, thank you. > > > > Best wishes, > > Haomian (on behalf of all authors) > > > > -----邮件原件----- > > 发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > > 发送时间: 2018年11月19日 15:55 > > 收件人: Victor Lopez <[email protected]>; Zhangxian (Xian) > > <[email protected]>; Oscar de Dios <[email protected]>; Oscar > > Gonzalez de Dios <[email protected]>; Zhenghaomian (Zhenghaomian, > > Optical &Microwave Technology Research Dept) > > <[email protected]> > > 主题: New Version Notification for > > draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-08.txt > > > > > > A new version of I-D, draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-08.txt > > has been successfully submitted by Haomian Zheng and posted to the IETF > > repository. > > > > Name: draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing > > Revision: 08 > > Title: Extensions to Path Computation Element Protocol > > (PCEP) to Support Resource Sharing-based Path Computation > > Document date: 2018-11-19 > > Group: Individual Submission > > Pages: 14 > > URL: > > https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-08.txt > > Status: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing/ > > Htmlized: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-08 > > Htmlized: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing > > Diff: > > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-08 > > > > Abstract: > > Resource sharing in a network means two or more Label Switched Paths > > (LSPs) use common piece(s) of resource along their paths. This can > > help save network resource and is useful in scenarios such as LSP > > recovery or when two LSPs do not need to be active at the same time. > > A Path Computation Element (PCE) is responsible for path computation > > with such requirement. The resource-sharing-based path computation > > with better efficiency can be achieved together with the association > > object in PCEP. > > > > This document extends the Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) > > in order to support resource sharing-based path computation, which > > is a special case in the association path computation. > > > > > > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > > submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at > > tools.ietf.org. > > > > The IETF Secretariat > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pce mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pce mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > ___________________________________________________ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, > exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message > par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les > pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou > falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or > privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be > distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete > this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been > modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
