Thanks Warren - noted. I have been in conference with my co-authors regarding Alvaro's comments. We are close to having a complete reply. My apologies for the delay.
Best regards Jon -----Original Message----- From: Warren Kumari <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, 7 December, 2018 4:41 PM To: The IESG <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-14: (with COMMENT) Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-14: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I’m balloting NoObj, but support Alvaro’s DISCUSS, especially point #4, and his comments, especially #1 and #7. _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
