Hi guys and happy new year! :-)

Would it temper the confusion below if we added the term "limitless" to
the L flag definition (section 5.1.1.)?

My 2 cents,

Julien


On 21/12/2018 18:14, Jonathan Hardwick wrote:
> I believe it is too late to change but I find L=1 meaning "no limit" is 
> *very* confusing. For me L stands for Limit and when L=1 there is a limit, 
> when L=0 there is none.
>
> [Jon] Agree, both that it is confusing and too late to change :-)


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to