Hi, We had rather limited response to the poll for adoption of this draft. Although no one objected, the voices in favour were not enough to convince us that the WG cares about this work.
Possibly this fell into a hole at Christmas. Possibly folk were put off by the draft having expired. Anyway, please take another week (until the 7th) to let us know your opinion on whether this draft should be adopted and why. Thanks, The Chairs -----Original Message----- From: Pce <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Julien Meuric Sent: 13 December 2018 13:05 To: [email protected] Subject: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-lazzeri-pce-residual-bw Dear WG, We discussed about draft-lazzeri-pce-residual-bw a couple of times during past IETF meetings. At that time, those in the room who had read it looked quite interested, but they were just a few. We now request a feedback from the list: do you support the adoption of draft-lazzeri-pce-residual-bw as a starting point for a PCE work item? (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lazzeri-pce-residual-bw-01) Please respond to the list, including your reasons if you do not support. Thanks Julien P.S.: We are aware that the latest version of the I-D has expired, but an adoption would solve that and a lack of interest may help the authors focus their effort on something else than a simple timer reset. _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
