Hi Donald, Thanks for your review, updated in the working copy.
Thanks! Dhruv On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 3:09 AM Donald Eastlake <[email protected]> wrote: > I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's > ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the > IESG. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > The summary of the review is Ready. > > Although the Security Considerations section is fairly short, it has > references to a number of relevant earlier RFCs that have quite > extensive Security Considerations sections. Furthermore PCEP was > previous extended to cover P2MP Traffic Engineered Label Switched > Paths and separately extended to be stateful. This draft's addition of > support for stateful P2MP TE LSPs is not that big of a change in > Security Considerations from those in the earlier RFCs. > > Editorial > > Section 3.2, Page 5, "are same as" -> "are the same as" > > Thanks, > Donald > =============================== > Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) > 1424 Pro Shop Court, Davenport, FL 33896 USA > [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
