Hi Adrian,

Sorry for being late.

This draft has been useful when implementing ACTN framework in some demonstrations. I think that this draft should go to the next level.

BR,

Ricard

On 01/04/2019 9:34, Adrian Farrel wrote:
So far you have all been very quiet.

Thanks,
Adrian

-----Original Message-----
From: Pce <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
Sent: 13 March 2019 22:01
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Pce] Working Group last call on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-06

Hi working group,

This email starts a working group last call for
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-06.

I would like to hear messages of support or concern about this draft.

If you support its progression towards publication as an RFC, please let us
know that you have read the latest revision, and explain why you think the
work is important. Indications of implementation would also be welcome -
although this document is informational, I believe some people may have
built stateful hierarchical PCEs for experimentation or deployment.

If you are opposed to the progression or have concerns please articulate
them.

As always, review comments and nits are most welcome.

Because of the effort that is going in to preparing for IETF-104 and because
of the time spent away, this last call will run for three weeks and end on
April 4th.

Thanks,
Adrian

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to