Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-10: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- A few simple items in the Security Considerations (Section 8): (1) s/security requirements defined in [RFC5440]/security considerations defined in [RFC5440]/. The motivation for this change is that the discussion of vulnerabilities and mitigations in [RFC5440] also applies. (2) Please include a reference to RFC7525 when recommending TLS/RFC8253 _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
